GrantAI prepares materials for advisers to review

An advisory team needs to know whether a funding call fits a client before writing the application. That means checking the conditions against the organisation profile and requesting missing information. GrantAI prepares material for that assessment. The adviser remains responsible for eligibility and project judgment.

Agree the sources and the task first

The pilot scope covers screening agreed calls, comparing them with an organisation profile and preparing initial drafts. Sources and programme types are agreed for each pilot. This is not a promise to cover every available grant.

The profile needs the information required by the actual call. Missing company-size or project-location data still needs to be collected. A thematic match alone does not establish entitlement to funding.

Treat the output as working material

The adviser needs to inspect where an extracted condition came from and what remains unconfirmed. A useful comparison makes those questions easier to review rather than hiding them behind a score.

For a selected call, the tool can prepare a first project description or an attachment checklist, with the exact deliverable agreed in the pilot. A model-generated budget or schedule is not an approved plan.

GrantAI does not replace the adviser. Project strategy, professional assessment and final approval remain with the team. The tool does not submit an application on your behalf.

Establish the benefit on your own work

A demo shows the inputs and proposed outputs. A pilot can then compare preparation time against the corrections and review it leaves for your team. Without that comparison, we do not promise a fixed time saving or a better application success rate.

Bring a client profile and a call you are already assessing. That gives you a familiar basis for agreeing the GrantAI pilot. To discuss the scope, contact us.