Monitoring and maintenance
Operation and support
Agree monitoring, ownership and response times within the contracted support scope.
MODERNIZATION · PERFORMANCE · FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
Modernizing legacy software that still works and still costs the business.
We take over systems that already run and plan the changes around what could break. Code and data come first, operations with them, and website optimization is a separate scope inside this service.
- Audit before changes
- Stages based on risk
- No unnecessary rewrite
BUSINESS IMPACT
Where the business loses performance
We measure the problem first and change technology only when the evidence supports it.
Access and recovery
System takeover
Check code ownership, access and deployment alongside the operations that must stay available.
Migration rehearsal
Data migration
A rehearsal compares source and target records, tests completeness and establishes a rollback path.
Stages and dependencies
Staged renewal
Replace risky components in verifiable stages ordered by dependencies and operating needs.
SOFTWARE MODERNIZATION
We modernize what holds back further growth
01
Technical audit
We measure performance and code health, then the architecture and the operational risk under it.
02
Takeover and stabilization
We restore access and documentation, get deployment working again and hand back control over operations.
03
Refactoring and migrations
We divide changes into reversible stages without unnecessary downtime.
04
Monitoring and further development
We set up oversight and priorities around results and business needs.
Who this is for
When this makes sense
- First step
- A technical audit with a risk map and priorities, and a recommended first scope.
You need to take over a project from another supplier or an internal team.
Technical debt and performance slow every further change. So does deployment.
The system has business value and you do not want to rewrite all of it without a reason.
A PRODUCT IN OPERATION · Existing-store optimization
Rastlinkovo
Rastlinkovo was already trading when we got there. We worked on performance and the shopping journey, and the case study shows our scope and the public screens. A takeover starts with an assessment.
- Problem addressed
- Performance, defects and selected interface areas in an existing WooCommerce store.
- Available evidence
- Named client and a description of the work performed. We do not publish a comparable before-and-after performance measurement.
PRICING
Cost follows the state of the system
Sequential stages
Each stage is priced separately. You only continue when the next step makes sense.
01
Technical audit
- A good fit when
- You are taking over an older system and need to know the risks.
- Outcome
- Code, architecture, infrastructure and the operational risk each one carries.
- Price for this stage
1 200 € + VAT
Timeline: 3 days
I'm interested in Technical auditWhat you get
- Written report
- Priorities and a recommended next step
02
Takeover and stabilization
- A good fit when
- The system needs a safe takeover without interrupting operation.
- Outcome
- One system, its critical access and deployment, and the operational risks that matter most.
- Price for this stage
from 4 500 € + VAT
Timeline: 2 to 4 weeks
What you get
- System map
- Stabilization changes
03
Modernization stage
- A good fit when
- The audit identified one priority ready for implementation.
- Outcome
- One bounded stage after an audit or takeover.
- Price for this stage
from 8 000 € + VAT
Timeline: 4 to 8 weeks
What you get
- Refactoring or migration
- Tests and monitoring
BRIEF FOR PRICING
Want a more accurate estimate?
Email the file to rise@rise.sk or paste a share link into the form.
Before commissioning the work
Before choosing a supplier
Questions to ask about scope, pricing and responsibility for the project
Before you commit
Comparisons for this service
Custom software vs. off-the-shelf SaaS
Criteria, a table and the real numbers behind both. When an off-the-shelf tool is enough, when your own pays off, and when the answer is to do nothing.
In-house team vs. agency
The real cost of both routes, when a first in-house hire makes sense, when an external team does, and where the line sits.
HOW WE TAKE RESPONSIBILITY
How we reduce risk
Before the first major change, we need to understand the code, operation, and business priorities.
Written system assessment
Risks and priorities come to you in a document, together with the first scope we would recommend.
Safe stages
Each stage has a goal, verification method, and deployment plan.
Transferable result
Code, access, and documentation remain under the client’s control.
Brief for leadership and procurement
Decision brief · Software modernization and development
A risk map and first stabilization stage that restores a safe path for further changes.
Changes in an inherited system are slow or risky because control over code and operations is missing.
First paid step
Technical audit
Code, architecture, infrastructure and the operational risk each one carries.
3 days1 200 € + VAT
What we need from the client
- • Access to code, environments, deployment, and available documentation.
- • Operational incidents, business priorities, and a person who knows the system.
Email the file to rise@rise.sk or paste a share link into the form.
How to prepare a project briefWhen it is not the right move
When we will not take over a modernization
There is no access to the code, infrastructure, or people who understand operations.
You expect a complete rewrite without an audit or transition plan.
QUESTIONS
Before taking over an existing system
No. We first identify the parts that still work and carry business value. A full rewrite is one option, not the starting point.
Yes. We need access to code, infrastructure, documentation, and the people who know the operation. Then we prepare a risk map and the first safe scope.
Yes. After takeover, we can provide support, monitoring, and further development according to priorities.
Backup and recovery are verified before anything changes. Then a trial migration, a data comparison and an agreed plan for downtime and rollback. Whether you can run in parallel depends on the system.
Code condition, dependencies, whatever tests exist and how critical the system is. An audit sets the first stage, then monitoring and response times get priced, and further development with them.